This is now available on my headwork page here:
http://www.redz31.com/pages/headwork.html
This port work was done by me and then improved upon on the exhaust side by a local engine builder with many years of experience doing custom ported cylinder heads. The difference was visually massive, but I'm not entirely sure how the flow was enhanced. Regardless (and curious), I gave him another set of heads for another VG I was building and asked for flow data on both intake and exhaust before and after porting. I had hoped for finer increments from .100 to .500 valve lift (about as much lift as people run on VG's) but flow bench time is very expensive. For a turbocharged vehicle you should [b]pay particular attention to the exhaust flow. Think about it this way: the engine is being force fed its intake air, it still has to expel the additional exhaust gasses itself, robbing power.
These numbers can be improved upon with further modification. This is a basic "Street/Strip" porting job:



Graphical images created from flow data (in CFM) shown below.
13% peak additional intake flow, 17% peak additional exhaust flow
The interesting thing to note is no loss (and in fact a gain) of flow at .100" and .200" We can assume our very low lift flow numbers did not change much, if at all.
http://www.redz31.com/pages/headwork.html
This port work was done by me and then improved upon on the exhaust side by a local engine builder with many years of experience doing custom ported cylinder heads. The difference was visually massive, but I'm not entirely sure how the flow was enhanced. Regardless (and curious), I gave him another set of heads for another VG I was building and asked for flow data on both intake and exhaust before and after porting. I had hoped for finer increments from .100 to .500 valve lift (about as much lift as people run on VG's) but flow bench time is very expensive. For a turbocharged vehicle you should [b]pay particular attention to the exhaust flow. Think about it this way: the engine is being force fed its intake air, it still has to expel the additional exhaust gasses itself, robbing power.
These numbers can be improved upon with further modification. This is a basic "Street/Strip" porting job:
Graphical images created from flow data (in CFM) shown below.
13% peak additional intake flow, 17% peak additional exhaust flow
The interesting thing to note is no loss (and in fact a gain) of flow at .100" and .200" We can assume our very low lift flow numbers did not change much, if at all.
Comment