Anyone measure their Head Chamber Volume?
-
spddm0nMember
- 79
Anyone measure their Head Chamber Volume?
I'm going through the process of checking and measuring everything on a couple new VG33E's I'm building and I ran into a discrepancy with the chamber volume on my 0w0 heads. I had actually calculated the chamber volume to be 53.5cc's based on all the other dimensions of the combustion chamber and the published compression ratio. Everything seemed to check out. Then, I decided to actually measure the chambers using a lexan plastic plate bolted to the bottom side of the head. I measured about 49cc's. I measured two sets of heads and repeated my measurements to be sure I wasn't making a mistake measuring. Same repeatable volume of 49cc's (+- 0.5cc).
I have had both sets of head milled by a machine shop, but they don't take off enough to adjust the volume by more than 1.2cc's (based on removing 0.010" of material - which is more than I would have wanted already). The other set I had milled, they removed 0.005". However, there was some confusion on the second set of heads (as to how much they really removed) and I think it may also have been 0.010". Both sets of heads measured 49cc's in each chamber after milling, so it's possible they did remove .010", since both sets measure the same. I measured the area of the chamber opening at the surface of the head too, and removing .010" calculates to about 1.2cc.
Has anyone measured their head chamber volumes? I would love to know the volume of the chamber is before they are ever milled. If they are around 50-51 cc's, that would make sense.
Since I can't find any published info on the chamber volume of these heads, I wonder what it really is. -
NissanEggSenior Member
- 5220
Don't forget about the volume of the headgasket at compressed thickness.
1986 300ZX Turbo…sold
1990 Skyline GT-R…new money pit
2014 Juke Nismo RS 6-speed…daily -
spddm0nMember
- 79
Yeah, I accounted for that. I didn't measure the gasket bore, so it could be a little off, but I did call Victor Reinz and the engineer told me the uncompressed volume was 0.048" with a 6% crush. Compressed should be .0451", OR 1.146mm.
I found an online reference to the VG30E that seems to be fairly specific, so I compared my results to it and made a couple assumptions. The gasket volume is low, relative to other volumes, so I don't think this is the primary source of the discrepancy. http://www.vondrachek.org/automotive…_tech/#StockV6
VG30E vs VG33E VG30E VG33E # CYLINDERS 6 6 KNOWN CYLINDER BORE 87.0 91.5 PUBLISHED STROKE 83.0 83.0 PUBLISHED GASKET THICKNESS (compressed) (mm) Victor Reinz 1.270 1.146 PUBLISHED GASKET BORE 87.0 91.5 ASSUMED DECK CLEARANCE 0.05 0.05 INTERNET REF VOLUME (cc) (cc) CYLINDER HEAD CHAMBER VOLUME (each) 52.5 49.0 MEASURED PISTON HEAD VOLUME 1.0 8.0 MEASURED GASKET VOLUME 7.55 7.54 CALCULATED SWEPT VOLUME 493.4 545.8 PUBLISHED DECK VOLUME 0.30 0.33 CALCULATED TOTAL COMPRESSED CHAMBER VOLUME 61.35 64.864 CALCULATED TOTAL UNCOMPRESSED VOLUME 554.8 610.6 CALCULATED ACTUAL TOTAL ENGINE VOLUME 3329 3275 CALCULATED TOTAL PUBLISHED ENGINE VOLUME (swept volume X 6 cyl's) 2960 3275 PUBLISHED COMPRESSION RATIO 9.04 9.41 CALCULATED Last edited by spddm0n; 05-25-2017, 12:08 PM.