link1330 link1331 link1332 link1333 link1334 link1335 link1336 link1337 link1338 link1339 link1340 link1341 link1342 link1343 link1344 link1345 link1346 link1347 link1348 link1349 link1350 link1351 link1352 link1353 link1354 link1355 link1356 link1357 link1358 link1359 link1360 link1361 link1362 link1363 link1364 link1365 link1366 link1367 link1368 link1369 link1370 link1371 link1372 link1373 link1374 link1375 link1376 link1377 link1378 link1379 link1380 link1381 link1382 link1383 link1384 link1385 link1386 link1387 link1388 link1389 link1390 link1391 link1392 link1393 link1394 link1395 link1396 link1397 link1398 link1399 link1400 link1401 link1402 link1403 link1404 link1405 link1406 link1407 link1408 link1409 link1410 link1411 link1412 link1413 link1414 link1415 link1416 link1417 link1418 link1419 link1420 link1421 link1422 link1423 link1424 link1425 link1426 link1427 link1428 link1429 link1430 link1431 link1432 link1433 link1434 link1435 link1436 link1437 link1438 link1439 link1440 link1441 link1442 link1443 link1444 link1445 link1446 link1447 link1448 link1449 link1450 link1451 link1452 link1453 link1454 link1455 link1456 link1457 link1458 link1459 link1460 link1461 link1462

Real reason for 87-89T hubs?

  • RocklinMike300zx
    RocklinMike300zx
    Senior Member
    • 276

    Real reason for 87-89T hubs?

    So I've been trying to find the answer but for some reason (incompetence or lack of people asking) I can't seem to find a final answer. When doing a Z32/R32 (or 87-89T) brake swap, why exactly are the 87-89T hubs needed? I've seen people say bolt-on vs. slip on rotors, but why is that particularly significant? Is it just a need for longer studs or is there something physically preventing the larger brakes from being used on the older hubs that cannot be given a fairly simple fix? Just curious, because I am getting larger wheels and would like to have some better looking brakes to go with them, but if I absolutely have to get the late model turbo hubs then I'll be spending a pretty penny more than I planned on already.

    I also figure I can't be the only person stupid enough to ask so it could be valuable for someone else that wants to see the same answer in the future.

    Oh, and yes, I really just want to get bigger brakes for the looks. I don't want people seeing my puny ass brakes when I have wheels that actually expose the calipers and rotors.
  • adamvann3
    adamvann3
    Senior Member
    • 4160

    #2
    Most aftermarket rotors (specifically the rotor hat) do not fit over bolt on style hubs. People have turned them down to a smaller diameter in the past (though I am unsure the offset difference between the two) to make room.

    Slip on (late turbo hubs) accept z32/s-chassis/r-chassis brakes or brake upgrades with just shimming the caliper (by shim I mean a washer).
    86na - BlueZ
    Shiro #366 - Kouki Monster
    85t - Mr Tickles
  • G-E
    G-E
    Junior Member
    • 6320

    #3
    Sounds like you need a bbk for the non-turbo hubs and have them shaved down … much cheaper than buying the turbo hubs at current market price, savings that can then go to the rest of the upgrade right?

    Go see the ASCO subforum for the groupbuy
  • Switchback Motions
    Switchback Motions
    Senior Member
    • 705

    #4
    As adamvann said, people machine the bolt-on style hubs down to a 140mm diameter and press in Turbo wheel studs. After that it is just a case of spacing the caliper with a washer to achieve the offset required.
  • adamvann3
    adamvann3
    Senior Member
    • 4160

    #5
    Has it been confirmed that bolt on style hubs have the same offset as slip on hubs? I know people have shaved down the bolt on hubs, but it normally involved something other than the z32 rotor and brake setup.
    86na - BlueZ
    Shiro #366 - Kouki Monster
    85t - Mr Tickles
  • G-E
    G-E
    Junior Member
    • 6320

    #6
    No the bolt on hubs without a rotor are the same height as the slip-on hubs WITH a rotor
  • Tempestas
    Tempestas
    Senior Member
    • 225

    #7
    i have turbo hubs laying around that I will never use… what do they go for these days? I can't even find any for sale to see.
  • reddzx
    reddzx
    Senior Citizen
    • 6440

    #8
    I have seen them go for as much as $250, but $150-$200 is more likely.



    1988 300ZX Turbo, Shiro Special #760
    1988 300ZX Turbo Automatic (wife's car)
    1991 Hard-body 2WD

    http://zccw.org/zccw/?page_id=1215
  • adamvann3
    adamvann3
    Senior Member
    • 4160

    #9
    G-E;341405 wrote: No the bolt on hubs without a rotor are the same height as the slip-on hubs WITH a rotor
    Ok, I dug through the brake thread and yes it looks like a couple of people are running straight z32 setup on turned down bolt on hubs. I just never really saw any good confirmation (but james should be able to put this to bed). I just know when I switched from bolt bolt on hubs on my 86 (zenki style hubs) the rear dust boot/seal would interfere against the spindle/dust shield. I had to install bolt on style rear seals onto the slip on style hub to make it work.

    This is why I was unsure of there was a difference in hub offset. I know slip on hubs only came with the twin piston calipers, so I was unsure if the caliper was offset accordingly.



    86na - BlueZ
    Shiro #366 - Kouki Monster
    85t - Mr Tickles
  • RocklinMike300zx
    RocklinMike300zx
    Senior Member
    • 276

    #10
    So it is possible to turn down the bolt on hubs, but considering the time and effort required it is just easier to go with the 87-89T hubs, yes? I found some R32 brakes at a good price and plan on getting them, so I guess I'll just figure out what to do about the hubs when the time comes. I just figured it would be good to get the options all laid out in one spot so I can figure it out a bit easier.
  • adamvann3
    adamvann3
    Senior Member
    • 4160

    #11
    Yes, 87-89t (slip on hubs) would be a bolt and go. Your bolt on hubs would need to be modified to work.
    86na - BlueZ
    Shiro #366 - Kouki Monster
    85t - Mr Tickles
  • RocklinMike300zx
    RocklinMike300zx
    Senior Member
    • 276

    #12
    Sounds good. I feel I should probably run to the junkyard and start ripping front hubs off all the late model turbos around here. Could make some decent cash that way it seems.
  • michaelp
    michaelp
    Senior Member
    • 9384

    #13
    I don't understand why anyone would want a BBK that requires having the hubs turned anyways…when you can just have the hubs turned then run any of the Z32 BBKs like people have been doing for years. A true BBK for bolt-on hubs would be one that requires no modification to the hubs. IMO
    - VG30DET (HE341) 86 300ZX - 1982 280ZX Turbo - Headered NA 1986 300ZX 2+2 - 2000 Xterra -
  • adamvann3
    adamvann3
    Senior Member
    • 4160

    #14
    Alright, I was digging through james's build thread and tried to search out some post in the suspension area as I know he went into more depth on everything (why can't we search sub-forums?). Looks like he used r32 calipers and rotors.

    I do remember him going into the bore size on the bolt on rotors IIRC it needed to be turned down as well (thats why he shows the measurement below). Again, when he reads this, I am sure he will chime in.

    james;203168 wrote: old N busted



    new N Hotness







    and this last pic shows the 4 pot ever so slightly visable through the factory 15" wheel

    car now rocks 20mm adapters front and rear
    86na - BlueZ
    Shiro #366 - Kouki Monster
    85t - Mr Tickles
  • Switchback Motions
    Switchback Motions
    Senior Member
    • 705

    #15
    adamvann3;341427 wrote:
    I do remember him going into the bore size on the bolt on rotors IIRC it needed to be turned down as well (thats why he shows the measurement below). Again, when he reads this, I am sure he will chime in.
    I believe the center bore is turned down to fit a new spacer to keep the rotors hub centric as the bolt-on hubs have a smaller surface in this area. Bolt-on hubs have approx 5mm bore depth where slip-ons have approx 15mm bore depth.