just as I started getting interest and replies the site was hacked so lets discuss these things again shall we? for whatever reason the z31.com post didn't get anywhere....
part 1: lowering with equal suspension travel
for this to work requires short body struts to stick into the tubes and either custom gland nuts or spacer rings to install below the gland nuts

part 2: converting the strut tower to a coilover without welding
almost any rear coilover will have the standard ball mount at the bottom, such as the 240sx, this mod would depend on finding one that fits into the strut tube and has little gap around it, and has an adjustment thread area made from steel or steel alloy.... a threaded "cap" would have to be machined to hold the coilover in the strut tube tight, pulling against the "pin" at the bottom

part 3: converting to a partial a-arm or wishbone design
the benefits of this would be adjustability to a more extreme caster/camber range of motion, but the tension rod is still required to locate the lower control arm unless the pivot can be made rigid somehow

addendum: the pivot angle relative to the car centerline of the upper a-arm would actually be better tilting down for rim/tire clearance, but then the motion would move the top of the wheel outward as it moves up causing more positive camber, but if it were only slightly below level at ride height then it could add caster initially until the tension rod is able to start arcing forward during compression
part 1: lowering with equal suspension travel
for this to work requires short body struts to stick into the tubes and either custom gland nuts or spacer rings to install below the gland nuts

part 2: converting the strut tower to a coilover without welding
almost any rear coilover will have the standard ball mount at the bottom, such as the 240sx, this mod would depend on finding one that fits into the strut tube and has little gap around it, and has an adjustment thread area made from steel or steel alloy.... a threaded "cap" would have to be machined to hold the coilover in the strut tube tight, pulling against the "pin" at the bottom

part 3: converting to a partial a-arm or wishbone design
the benefits of this would be adjustability to a more extreme caster/camber range of motion, but the tension rod is still required to locate the lower control arm unless the pivot can be made rigid somehow

addendum: the pivot angle relative to the car centerline of the upper a-arm would actually be better tilting down for rim/tire clearance, but then the motion would move the top of the wheel outward as it moves up causing more positive camber, but if it were only slightly below level at ride height then it could add caster initially until the tension rod is able to start arcing forward during compression
Comment