-
17x10 -18 on the front
17x10 -25 on the rear
bitches…
lulz -
-2.5* camber in the rear with respectable toe......86na - BlueZ
Shiro #366 - Kouki Monster
85t - Mr Tickles -
-
I'd love to see my car stanced as hell, but function is more important…
I gues I'll do the camber mod on the subframe and make it a better runner instead of going the opposit direction.
Here's the link to the add if someone's looking for a decent set of wheels.
http://montreal.kijiji.ca/c-autos-et…AdIdZ482207474
***
For you anglo's, they just came back from a sandblast, and powercoat. Custom lip in the back.
''And at the end of the day you have a Mitsubishi. It's like masturbating with your own tears.'' Neit86T -
Actually a 17x9.5 +0 will come out 9mm more than 16x8 -10.ExtremeAtheist;332242 wrote: Because if you have a 9.5 inch wheel, the center line (how we measure offset) is different than in an 8 inch wheel… -
For you guys that want a nice visual representation of how width and offset affect the wheel, check out the link below and start typing in values.
http://www.willtheyfit.com/
1988 300zxt. gt35, stance, etc. Wheels: Varrstoen ES2 18x9.5 et-13 225/40. 18x10.5 et0 245/40
1990 jetta vr6'd -
As stated in a previous discussion, the greatest variable with wheel fitment, is the user's definition of "flush".frostvectron;332241 wrote: Hmm interesting. 16x8 -10 seems to be flush for mine.
"…i think bov needs oil, its not closing fast enough so the car dies when you come off of boost…" -Automotive Genius -
mmhmm…however.BSRJIRONMAN;332314 wrote: As stated in a previous discussion, the greatest variable with wheel fitment, is the user's definition of "flush".
16x8 -10
Rear needs a huge spacer though…because camber. And front needs moar low.- VG30DET (HE341) 86 300ZX - 1982 280ZX Turbo - Headered NA 1986 300ZX 2+2 - 2000 Xterra - -
Correct but I had taken this into account already when posting my comparison…ExtremeAtheist;332331 wrote: Yeah, 19mm difference but still. Wider wheel will need a different offset to sit in the same spot as a narrower wheel due to the lip to centerline difference.
But anyway it is true, "flush" is a subjective term.
Back on topic:
http://zilvia.net/f/wheels-tires/518…5-45-17-a.html
Always loved these wheels… 17x9 +15 including 245/45/17 Falken Azenis for $800. -
ATTENTION 4 LUGGERS
SSR REVERSE MESH 17X9.5 et32 17x10.75 et3 4x114
http://zilvia.net/f/wheels-tires/517…et3-4x114.html
Fronts: 17x9.5 et32
Rears: 17x10.75 to 11 et0 to et3
See link for pics
1988 300zxt. gt35, stance, etc. Wheels: Varrstoen ES2 18x9.5 et-13 225/40. 18x10.5 et0 245/40
1990 jetta vr6'd -
I would go 4-lug for those…
"…i think bov needs oil, its not closing fast enough so the car dies when you come off of boost…" -Automotive Genius -
my alltime fav wheels.
2500$
17x9.5/10.5 +5 offset all around.
wrapped with falcon ziex 512
215/45 on fronts and 225/45 on rears.
4 inch lips on front 5 inch lips on back
-
Link sucks. Here's the real linkslammedcoupe;333020 wrote: my alltime fav wheels.
2500$
17x9.5/10.5 +5 offset all around.
wrapped with falcon ziex 512
215/45 on fronts and 225/45 on rears.
4 inch lips on front 5 inch lips on back
http://bcrwd.com/index.php?showtopic=13895 -
thanks mang -
For whomever desires to be the ballerest baller of all nismo fanboys
2- 1895 +12 front
2- 18105 +15 rear
Will include tires for extra $200
225/40 nitto Neo gen 80% tread left
235/40 sumitomo HTR Zlll 80% tread left
1988 300zxt. gt35, stance, etc. Wheels: Varrstoen ES2 18x9.5 et-13 225/40. 18x10.5 et0 245/40
1990 jetta vr6'd
Copyright © 2006–. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy